The Gauhati High Court has overturned orders issued by a civil court in Bongaigaon that closed the plaintiff’s evidence for failure to take necessary steps, emphasizing that “a fair trial includes providing both parties a fair opportunity to present their cases.”
On April 29, 2022, the Civil Judge of Bongaigaon had closed the plaintiff’s evidence after the plaintiffs failed to proceed with their case. A subsequent petition filed by the plaintiffs to reopen the evidence was dismissed on May 19, 2022.
In his ruling, Justice Robin Phukan noted, “It is well established that the right to a fair trial is fundamental for both parties in civil and criminal proceedings. This includes offering a fair opportunity for both parties to prove their respective cases.”
The petitioners had contested the Civil Judge’s April 29 order, which closed their evidence in a title suit due to their inaction. Their counsel argued that despite the closure, three witnesses remained unexamined, and their testimonies were crucial to the case.
The plaintiffs had also sought an additional date to submit their evidence, but their request was denied by the Civil Judge in a May 19 ruling.
Dear Reader,
Every day, our team at EastMojo travels through rain, rough roads, and remote hills to bring you stories that matter – stories from your town, your people, your Northeast.
We do this because we believe in truthful, independent journalism. No big corporate backing, no government pressure – just honest reporting by local journalists who live and breathe the same air you do.
But to keep doing this work, we need you. Your small contribution helps us pay our reporters fairly, reach places others ignore, and keep asking the tough questions.
If you believe the Northeast deserves its own fearless voice, stand with us.
Support independent journalism. Be a Member.
Thank you,
Karma Paljor
Editor-in-Chief, eastmojo.com
After hearing arguments from both sides, the High Court agreed with the petitioners and set aside the April 29 and May 19 orders. The case has been sent back to the Civil Judge, Bongaigaon, with instructions to proceed in accordance with the law.
“Considering the submissions from both parties and the facts on record, this Court finds merit in the petition. Therefore, the impugned orders dated April 29, 2022, and May 19, 2022, are hereby set aside,” the High Court ruled.
Also read | Mizoram has received Rs. 8 crore central aid for refugee relief since 2021
